Catalog: Moraes et al. (2004a);

 

- Yoshida-Shaul & Chant (1995a) mentioned that Oudemans (1936) had considered this species as nomen nudum. Actually, Oudemans (1936) considered the citations of this species by Koch (1841, 1842) and Walckenaer (1847) as nomen nudum, without any explanation. The statement of Oudemans (1836) way be incorrect, given that this species had been described by Koch in 1839.;